A Practical AI Governance Framework for SaaS
AI governance aligns roles, risk, controls, and assurance for systems using ML/LLMs. A practical framework uses one policy backbone, clear accountability, risk taxonomy, change gates, human oversight, logging, incident handling, and continual improvement. It should map to ISO 42001 and be informed by NIST AI RMF.
Key Facts
-
Governance assigns accountable roles and decision rights for AI systems.
[1] -
Risk management identifies hazards and treatments with traceable decisions.
[1] -
Controls include testing, oversight, logging, and deployment approvals.
[1] -
Continual improvement requires monitoring, reviews, and CAPA.
[1] -
Using recognized frameworks supports assurance and auditability.
[2]
Implementation Steps
- 01
Policy & roles → AI policy, RACI.
- 02
Risk process → risk register, decisions, exceptions.
- 03
Change & testing → gated releases, test logs.
- 04
Oversight & logging → oversight records, audit logs.
- 05
Assurance loop → reviews, metrics, CAPA.
Glossary
References
-
[1]
ISO 42001 AI Management Systems Standard https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html
-
[2]
NIST AI Risk Management Framework https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
Machine-Readable Facts
[
{
"id": "f-roles",
"claim": "AI governance requires clear roles and decision rights for AI systems.",
"source": "https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html"
},
{
"id": "f-controls",
"claim": "Governance embeds controls such as testing, oversight, and logging.",
"source": "https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html"
},
{
"id": "f-improve",
"claim": "Continual improvement is a core governance requirement with reviews and CAPA.",
"source": "https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html"
}
]