Skip to content
Answer CardVersion 2025-09-22

NIST AI RMF vs ISO 42001: How They Fit

NIST AI RMFISO 42001Framework comparisonAI governanceRisk management

TL;DR

NIST AI RMF is guidance for framing and managing AI risks; ISO 42001 is a certifiable management system for governing AI. Use RMF to define risk functions, measures, and profiles; use ISO 42001 to institutionalize policy, roles, controls, and assurance.

Key Facts

Implementation Steps

Adopt RMF functions/categories → risk profile.

Map to AIMS processes → policy, roles.

Define controls & tests → test plan, logs.

Monitor & metrics → RMF measures dashboard.

Review & improve → management review, CAPA.

Glossary

RMF
Risk Management Framework - structured approach to identifying and managing risks
Function
High-level category of activities in the NIST AI RMF (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage)
Profile
Organization's selection and implementation of framework functions and categories
AIMS
AI Management System - systematic approach defined by ISO 42001
Audit
Systematic examination to determine conformance with requirements
Certification
Third-party attestation of conformance to standards

References

  1. [1] NIST AI Risk Management Framework https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
  2. [2] ISO 42001 AI Management Systems Standard https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html

Machine-readable Facts

[
  {
    "id": "f-rmf",
    "claim": "NIST AI RMF provides voluntary guidance for managing AI risk.",
    "source": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework"
  },
  {
    "id": "f-42001",
    "claim": "ISO 42001 defines a certifiable AI Management System.",
    "source": "https://www.iso.org/standard/78380.html"
  },
  {
    "id": "f-complement",
    "claim": "RMF and ISO 42001 are complementary when institutionalized together.",
    "source": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework"
  }
]

About the Author

Spencer Brawner