Skip to content
Threat Briefing // Agentic AI

The OWASP Agentic Top 10.

AI agents are no longer theoretical. They plan, act, and make decisions across your infrastructure. The OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications (2026) defines the critical security risks you need to address before these systems go to production.

3 Critical | 4 High | 3 Medium
Section 01 // Threat Matrix

10 Critical Agentic Risks

 OWASP 2026 FRAMEWORK
ASI01

Agent Goal Hijack

Critical

Manipulation of instructions, inputs, or external content to redirect an agent's objectives. Agents often cannot reliably separate instructions from data, allowing attackers to alter decision paths through malicious text content.

Impact

Complete loss of agent control, unauthorized actions executed on behalf of users, data exfiltration disguised as legitimate operations.

Mitigation

Input validation layers, instruction-data separation architectures, behavioral guardrails, continuous monitoring of agent decision paths.

ASI02

Tool Misuse & Exploitation

Critical

Agents misusing legitimate tools due to prompt manipulation, misalignment, or unsafe delegation. Ambiguous prompts or manipulated input can cause agents to call tools with destructive parameters or chain tools in unexpected sequences.

Impact

Data loss, unauthorized system modifications, exfiltration through legitimate tool interfaces, cascading damage across integrated systems.

Mitigation

Tool-level access controls, parameter validation, execution sandboxing, call-chain analysis, least-privilege tool permissions.

ASI03

Identity & Privilege Abuse

Critical

Exploitation of inherited credentials, cached tokens, delegated permissions, or agent-to-agent trust boundaries. Compromised agents can silently escalate privileges and move laterally across systems without triggering traditional alerts.

Impact

Full trust-domain compromise, lateral movement across infrastructure, privilege escalation beyond intended agent scope.

Mitigation

Zero-trust agent architectures, short-lived tokens, granular permission scoping, agent identity verification, privilege boundary enforcement.

ASI04

Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

High

Compromised tools, descriptors, models, or personas influencing agent behavior. Dynamic MCP and A2A ecosystems enable runtime components to be poisoned at scale.

Impact

Backdoored agent behaviors, compromised tool integrations, supply chain attacks propagating through agent ecosystems.

Mitigation

Tool provenance verification, model integrity checks, runtime component validation, supply chain security audits.

ASI05

Unexpected Code Execution

High

Agents generating or executing untrusted or attacker-controlled code. Natural-language execution paths unlock dangerous new avenues for remote code execution.

Impact

Remote code execution, infrastructure compromise, persistent backdoors installed through agent-generated code.

Mitigation

Code execution sandboxing, static analysis of generated code, execution policy enforcement, output validation.

ASI06

Memory & Context Poisoning

High

Persistent corruption of agent memory, RAG stores, embeddings, or contextual knowledge. Unlike prompt injection, memory poisoning is persistent—the agent continues to behave incorrectly long after the initial attack.

Impact

Long-term behavioral drift, persistent misinformation, corrupted decision-making across sessions and interactions.

Mitigation

Memory integrity validation, embedding provenance tracking, RAG store monitoring, context hygiene protocols.

ASI07

Insecure Inter-Agent Communication

High

Spoofed, intercepted, or manipulated messages between agents in multi-agent systems. Weak A2A communication allows attackers to impersonate trusted agents and influence entire agent clusters.

Impact

Multi-agent system compromise, coordinated agent manipulation, trust chain exploitation across agent networks.

Mitigation

Authenticated agent channels, encrypted inter-agent protocols, message integrity verification, trust boundary enforcement.

ASI08

Cascading Failures

Medium

Small inaccuracies compound and propagate through automated pipelines with escalating impact. A minor misalignment in one agent can trigger system-wide outages, business logic failures, or operational loops.

Impact

System-wide outages, compounding errors across pipelines, runaway resource consumption, business logic corruption.

Mitigation

Circuit breakers, blast radius containment, agent output validation gates, failure isolation boundaries, rollback mechanisms.

ASI09

Human-Agent Trust Exploitation

Medium

Humans overly relying on agent recommendations, leading to unsafe approvals or exposures. Confident, polished explanations can mislead human operators into approving harmful actions.

Impact

Unsafe actions approved by overriding human judgment, social engineering through agent outputs, compliance violations.

Mitigation

Human-in-the-loop protocols, confidence calibration, explainable agent decisions, approval workflow design, operator training.

ASI10

Rogue Agents

Medium

Misaligned or compromised agents that act harmfully while appearing legitimate. They may self-repeat actions, persist across sessions, impersonate other agents, or silently approve unsafe actions.

Impact

Persistent data exfiltration, silent approval of unsafe operations, resource abuse, long-term undetected compromise.

Mitigation

Agent behavioral monitoring, anomaly detection, session isolation, agent provenance verification, kill switches.

Section 02 // Engagement

How We Help You Respond

 OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES

Reconnaissance

We map your agentic attack surface against all 10 ASI vectors. Tool chains, memory stores, inter-agent protocols, credential flows, and human-agent interfaces are audited for exploitable weaknesses.

Fortification

We implement guardrails, sandboxing, privilege boundaries, and circuit breakers tailored to your agent architecture. Every mitigation is mapped to specific ASI threats and tested under adversarial conditions.

Certification

We prepare documentation, evidence packs, and governance frameworks aligned to ISO 42001, SOC 2 AI controls, and the OWASP Agentic Top 10 to satisfy auditors, regulators, and enterprise customers.

This briefing is based on the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications (2026), developed through collaboration with 100+ industry experts, researchers, and practitioners. The full specification is open-source and freely available.

Published by the OWASP Gen AI Security Project · December 2025

Is your agent architecture secure?

We assess your AI agents against the full OWASP Agentic Top 10 and deliver a prioritized remediation roadmap.

// END OF DOCUMENT //